Permalink for Comment #1375480148 by FACTSAREUSELESS

, comment by FACTSAREUSELESS
FACTSAREUSELESS @sparkledaisy said:
This is negative. Reviews should be done by people who were actually at the show. Lucky for you... The brightness on the TV can be turned down if it's too cheesy when the light is growing brighter.
Can't agree with this statement and its been made too often this year by others as well.
The fact is, a person at home watching the webcast is the PERFECT choice to do the review. They are more focused on the actual music than someone being jostled and distracted by the crowd around them and affected by the other factors at the venue.

A music review is truly best done by someone NOT in attendance.
Score: 0    
Phish.net Login
Secure Login
Register | Forgot Password
Support Phish.net & Mbird
Make a Donation
Phish.net is a project of the non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.
Recent Blog Posts
Crossing Continents and Finding Phish: A European Phan’s Tale 2024-12-26
From the Forum: 'Twas the Week Before New Year's 2024-12-24
Results of the 9th Runaway Open 2024-11-02
Albany3 Recap: Never Play It The Same Way Once 2024-10-29
Albany2 Recap: The Use of Keys to Every Door 2024-10-27
Albany1 Recap: A Requiem For Phil 2024-10-26
Surrender To The Flow #86: Albany Divided Sky Benefit 2024 2024-10-23
HAPPY 60TH BIRTHDAY, TREY! 2024-09-30
Phish Studies 101 webinar almost here! 2024-09-23
From the Forum 2: "Mike's Song" in late '92 and "Weekapaug Groove" in early '93 2024-09-19


Phish.net

Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.

This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.

Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA

© 1990-2024  The Mockingbird Foundation, Inc.