Permalink for Comment #1379575505 by User_69501_

, comment by User_69501_
User_69501_ @FunkDog said:

Hopefully, with time and understanding, you will be able to respect and appreciate points of views outside of your own.
The article received disapproval. Bringing it in here, it also receives disapproval. There is a reason, a good reason, why academic papers are peer reviewed.
And there it is.
People came in and downvoted this very rational, well stated comment. I guess the wokesters can dish out the abuse but can't take a very astute observation for what it is, the truth.
I think it shows exactly which group is the fragile one.
Don't often agree with you funkdog but in this case nail meet head.
Score: 11    
Phish.net Login
Secure Login
Register | Forgot Password
Support Phish.net & Mbird
Make a Donation
Phish.net is a project of the non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.
Recent Blog Posts
Results of the 9th Runaway Open 2024-11-02
Albany3 Recap: Never Play It The Same Way Once 2024-10-29
Albany2 Recap: The Use of Keys to Every Door 2024-10-27
Albany1 Recap: A Requiem For Phil 2024-10-26
Surrender To The Flow #86: Albany Divided Sky Benefit 2024 2024-10-23
HAPPY 60TH BIRTHDAY, TREY! 2024-09-30
Phish Studies 101 webinar almost here! 2024-09-23
From the Forum 2: "Mike's Song" in late '92 and "Weekapaug Groove" in early '93 2024-09-19
Summer Tour 2024 Reprise 2024-09-15
The First and Last Words from Dick's 2024-09-07


Phish.net

Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.

This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.

Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA

© 1990-2024  The Mockingbird Foundation, Inc.