Permalink for Comment #1377483902 by Wombat_en_Fuego

, comment by Wombat_en_Fuego
Wombat_en_Fuego @Hammy said:
So you cannot even recognize on any primal, base level that YOU are the BUTT of the joke? Instead you deploy a variety of thin, psycho-babel meets Zen journey. I'm sure there is a mirror close by. Ask yourself, "Why does phish mock 20+ min jams as a basis for quality?" "Why does Phish despise critics of live performance who experience it through the medium of a 3rd screen?" ""How does song placement affect my ability to experience the song itself-no matter placement played?" "If a song isn't great as a 2nd set opener why do I get so excited if played to open?" "How do the actions of Phish.net further advance the context, understanding and expansive interpretation of Phish's music?" Answer to last question: You destroy meaning, devalue live performance, have objective criteria to quality of music that is only quantified by meaning to the listener in the moment. Not by some buffoon who "rates and judges" PHISH by length. Clearly, your "length" is greatly inhibited thus the above sexist, homophobic cartoon.
Hammy, you do realize you are not forced to use Phish.net, right? If you want to rant on something, go to a political page and have at it.

Does anyone know, is there a way to block users such this? I never thought I'd have to ask that on Phish.net...


Phish.net

Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.

This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.

Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA

© 1990-2024  The Mockingbird Foundation, Inc. | Hosted by Linode