 I think that most of the voting bias comes from the clear accessibility of the jam. We have such quick access to Phish music now, with PPV and Phish.in.  I feel that the older crowd holds those older jams close to the breast because it came during a pivotal moment in that phan's life.  I really like the comment where we are taking away from the 3.0 fan base when we lambaste the Tahoe Tweezer.  Yes, we are taking the low turnout into account - I mean there are thousands of phans who would disagree with this list, but they didn't vote.  The Tahoe Tweezer is of the upper echelon, and I can understand why it is considered number 1.  Comparing the 94 Providence Bowie to Tahoe Tweezer would do both a disservice, yet if you juxtapose them, The Tahoe's quality is that much more in depth because the band is in a more mature place now.  It would be interesting if they ran this again to see if the results were different, now that people see the initial results.  Would more people vote because they see how the results were against their opinions?
		I think that most of the voting bias comes from the clear accessibility of the jam. We have such quick access to Phish music now, with PPV and Phish.in.  I feel that the older crowd holds those older jams close to the breast because it came during a pivotal moment in that phan's life.  I really like the comment where we are taking away from the 3.0 fan base when we lambaste the Tahoe Tweezer.  Yes, we are taking the low turnout into account - I mean there are thousands of phans who would disagree with this list, but they didn't vote.  The Tahoe Tweezer is of the upper echelon, and I can understand why it is considered number 1.  Comparing the 94 Providence Bowie to Tahoe Tweezer would do both a disservice, yet if you juxtapose them, The Tahoe's quality is that much more in depth because the band is in a more mature place now.  It would be interesting if they ran this again to see if the results were different, now that people see the initial results.  Would more people vote because they see how the results were against their opinions?
	 Phish.net
Phish.netPhish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.
This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.
Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA
 The Mockingbird Foundation
The Mockingbird FoundationThe Mockingbird Foundation is a non-profit organization founded by Phish fans in 1996 to generate charitable proceeds from the Phish community.
And since we're entirely volunteer – with no office, salaries, or paid staff – administrative costs are less than 2% of revenues! So far, we've distributed over $2 million to support music education for children – hundreds of grants in all 50 states, with more on the way.