Permalink for Comment #1375705875 by bertoletdown

, comment by bertoletdown
bertoletdown @fluff_hen said:
With all due respect, you are also claiming knowledge of other peoples' thought process. Fine to dislike the 1/1 song selection, fine to critique the jams or energy, but no one on the staff knows what the band members were thinking, and your interpretation of their expressions is completely subjective. Sometimes a show is disjointed and weak, full of audible miscues, but 1/1 was not.
It wasn't a clambake but I also wouldn't call it tight.

The adjective I think best applies is "listless." There was no purpose, no drive, no direction, no fire. At all.
Score: 1    
Phish.net Login
Secure Login
Register | Forgot Password
Support Phish.net & Mbird
Make a Donation
Phish.net is a project of the non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.
Recent Blog Posts
Crossing Continents and Finding Phish: A European Phan’s Tale 2024-12-26
From the Forum: 'Twas the Week Before New Year's 2024-12-24
Results of the 9th Runaway Open 2024-11-02
Albany3 Recap: Never Play It The Same Way Once 2024-10-29
Albany2 Recap: The Use of Keys to Every Door 2024-10-27
Albany1 Recap: A Requiem For Phil 2024-10-26
Surrender To The Flow #86: Albany Divided Sky Benefit 2024 2024-10-23
HAPPY 60TH BIRTHDAY, TREY! 2024-09-30
Phish Studies 101 webinar almost here! 2024-09-23
From the Forum 2: "Mike's Song" in late '92 and "Weekapaug Groove" in early '93 2024-09-19


Phish.net

Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.

This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.

Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA

© 1990-2024  The Mockingbird Foundation, Inc.