Permalink for Comment #1375461023 by FACTSAREUSELESS

, comment by FACTSAREUSELESS
FACTSAREUSELESS I wasn't upset or offended by the review. I was defending those that the admin. members were condescendingly making fun of because they had the "audacity" to state that they were looking for something more than a memoir.

Never thought @johnnyd was directing anything at me, but his comment pushed me over the edge of aggravation.

A week and a half ago you had a guest blogger on here who wrote a review for one of the SPAC shows which had very little musical analysis. I made a good natured comment in my post about in that thread about how nice the review was and it would be nice to have a little more analysis, but nice job, sort of thing.

She, rather than acting like a two-year-old, accommodated everyone by adding an excellent four-paragraph addendum to her review which added much. Many appreciated it and stated so.

That's all the first few people in this thread were asking for. I didn't care. It would've been nice, but then @TheEmu posted his whining, juvenile "The show sucked, can't you tell?" bullshit, as in "I'm taking my ball and going home now because you're all mean".

Stupid. That's what started all this.

So I'm happy that you've exercised your right to swear and call names. I'm just telling it like I see it.

I'm not posting again. Feel free to have the last word if you like, I'm done.


Phish.net

Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.

This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.

Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA

© 1990-2024  The Mockingbird Foundation, Inc.