@johnnyd said:

@morgan_1 said:

I have been reading this site damn near since it was created and I just now registered so I could comment on what the point of this "review" is. Laughable, come on.

I rarely deign to speak on behalf of the Site Team without privately consulting them first, but I will draw on all the sarcasm we can collectively muster in saying, "Thank you for your contributions to our site and community."

Your comment is not appreciated by me nor do I think it's remotely funny. @TheEmu is the champion on this site when it comes to snarky, pissy, negative comments, including his lonely and whiney contribution to this thread.

I was constructive in my criticism and tried to end on a positive note but you guys won't have it.

It would be nice if you all would stop circling the wagons around each other like a juvenile high school clique every time someone gets their toes stepped on.

I love this site and try to be positive most all of the time. Only a couple of people in this thread have been nasty in their comments, most everyone else was simply giving honest feedback. There's no need to escalate the dialogue by getting all defensive.

The reviewer took a different approach. I respect that. It was also a risk. Many people, myself included, have come to look forward to the regularly excellent commentary and perspective that comes from the admin. team, and I appreciate all of you for it, but you folks are waaaaay too sensitive at times and this is one of them.

There's nothing nasty or thankless about expecting some musical analysis when we come to this blog to read a recap. You've set the standard for it, and people have come to expect it. When it doesn't happen, you need to know that they'll be some dissappointed folks.