Permalink for Comment #1375158454 by NoHayBanda

, comment by NoHayBanda
NoHayBanda so, i dont mean to be a dick, i am just interested in this and would love to see it done correctly. but the more i think about this, the more im sure this is showing the opposite of what is true.

the reason shows were so 'unpredictable' early was due to heavy repeats. just look at any notebook and compare it with a gap chart for that show. i randomly looked at 02.07.1991

http://phish.net/treys-notebook?basedate=1991-02-07 /> http://phish.net/setlists/gapchart.php?d=1991-02-07 />
due to the rules of treys notebook, this show was highly unpredictable. when in reality, there were THIRTEEN repeats from the night before. and five more on a 2 show gap.

due to their small song catalog, they were flooded with massive repeats early in their career, trey's notbook just isnt set up to evaluate them properly.
Score: 1    
Phish.net Login
Secure Login
Register | Forgot Password
Support Phish.net & Mbird
Make a Donation
Phish.net is a project of the non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.
Recent Blog Posts
Crossing Continents and Finding Phish: A European Phan’s Tale 2024-12-26
From the Forum: 'Twas the Week Before New Year's 2024-12-24
Results of the 9th Runaway Open 2024-11-02
Albany3 Recap: Never Play It The Same Way Once 2024-10-29
Albany2 Recap: The Use of Keys to Every Door 2024-10-27
Albany1 Recap: A Requiem For Phil 2024-10-26
Surrender To The Flow #86: Albany Divided Sky Benefit 2024 2024-10-23
HAPPY 60TH BIRTHDAY, TREY! 2024-09-30
Phish Studies 101 webinar almost here! 2024-09-23
From the Forum 2: "Mike's Song" in late '92 and "Weekapaug Groove" in early '93 2024-09-19


Phish.net

Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.

This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.

Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA

© 1990-2024  The Mockingbird Foundation, Inc.