Permalink for Comment #1345321064 by hrc333

, comment by hrc333
hrc333 Ok...I never comment on these reviews but I think it is time to stop having people who are not attending the show write a review (and I find it hard to believe that no one from .net was there). There is so much more to a show than can be seen and felt on a webcast. Reviews should be for people who were not there can get a feel for what it was like to be there. Clearly the reviewer 'missed' the special feeling of this show. While this show definitely did not have as many highs as some shows, the highs in DWD & Tweezer where much better than this reviewer was giving credit. Plus the snide comments about 'Storeage Jamming' seem uncalled for a show review.

While I can appreciate reviewers trying to be critical, it seems that most of the reviewers on Phish.net have lost their passion for the band. The reviews on .net seem overly critical and often snide, to the point that really feels those writing the reviews are chasing jams for previous era's as opposed to appreciating the era that we are in.


Phish.net

Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.

This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.

Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA

© 1990-2024  The Mockingbird Foundation, Inc. | Hosted by Linode