Permalink for Comment #1378558247 by mgolia6

, comment by mgolia6
mgolia6 So I’m commenting again. I think it’s comical that the criticism comes out when someone is doing some random ad hoc analysis of phish, leisurely of course. Sure this band has spawned university level courses, but really, someone taking their own time to work out a formula with which to better understand the ratings of Dicks in clear comparison to lag time between shows is simply what this band is about and what makes me proud to be part of this community. Granted there are better statisticians than I, better number crunchers and data scientists out there but ultimately we can all agree its cool that we take our free time to utilize our skills of analysis to dissect this band.

Bravo for the thread. And bravo for the band. And I am all about adding additional criterion In order to de-subjectify (made up word) a subject that is entirely fraught with subjectivity.

I love this stuff.


Phish.net

Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.

This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.

Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal

© 1990-2019  The Mockingbird Foundation, Inc. | Hosted by End Point Corporation