Permalink for Comment #1378440746 by phish728

, comment by phish728
phish728 As someone who didnt get the chance to be at the show or watch the webcast, its nice to read reviews that make you feel that you were there - ones that delve into the musicality, the jamming styles / highlights, the flow throughout the set. Trust me, ive read many terribly boring reviews that just go through the setlist 1 by 1 and say literally nothing interesting about anything. So agree with the author there. Frankly, i liked the Authors idea from the onset, it got me excited to read the review, but what followed was poor execution - no meat and didn’t tell me anything about the show other than what everyone else already knew - Gloria, The Blues winning etc. I heard that people thought that they would spell Gloria throughout set 2, but then they threw a “twist” in there instead. Anyway, appreciative of all review writers and people that do this for the love, maybe this is just constructive criticism for next time! I welcome the author to develop further his stylistic preachings and try again. Go read some Mr Miner for inspiration! Best of all time


Phish.net

Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.

This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.

Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal

© 1990-2019  The Mockingbird Foundation, Inc. | Hosted by End Point Corporation