Permalink for Comment #1378203067 by mikh2wg

, comment by mikh2wg
mikh2wg Oh look, someone on the site team took an opportunity to write a snarky review full of in-jokes about things that only the site team understands. Did he present facts or analysis to back up his opinions? Not really. Why would that be necessary in a music review? It's so much more fun to be critical and clever and then laugh with self satisfaction at all of us who disagree.
How many more posts like this are y'all gonna put up?
Score: 1    
Phish.net Login
Secure Login
Register | Forgot Password
Support Phish.net & Mbird
Make a Donation
Phish.net is a project of the non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.
Recent Blog Posts
Phish Studies Conference Unveils 2024 Agenda, Sphere PhanArt Event 2024-04-17
Attendance Bias Podcast Revisits Phil Lesh And Phriends At The Warfield, April 15-16-17, 1999 2024-04-15
Surrender To The Flow #82: Las Vegas 2024 2024-04-12
PhishNet Was Born June 22, 1991 2024-03-18
Divided Sky Foundation Announces 2024 Fun(d) Run and Music Fest 2024-03-12
This Time Will Be Different: Attendance Bias Podcast Celebrates 15 Years Since Hampton 2009 2024-03-01
REPRISE Phish Tribute Debut Streaming Free from Nectar's 2024-02-29
Mexico4 Recap: Meet The New Phish, Same As The Old Phish 2024-02-25
Mexico3 Recap: Then Came the Sound 2024-02-24
Mexico2 Recap: Never-ending Wave of Hope 2024-02-23


Phish.net

Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.

This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.

Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA

© 1990-2024  The Mockingbird Foundation, Inc. | Hosted by Linode