Permalink for Comment #1376755630 by FACTSAREUSELESS

, comment by FACTSAREUSELESS
FACTSAREUSELESS @jacnaughton said:
Not a good review, it was short, uninformative and in no way a critical examination of what may not have been the best show of 3.0 but certainly had many high points such as the bathtub gin and scent of a mule that you failed to even acknowledge (maybe you missed them) as well as a second set moma dance that had the place going wild. I don't mind reviews from people who watch couch tour but if you're just going to write a hack ass lack luster review you clearly wrote in 5 minutes maybe it's time to give it up.
Except they didn't play Bathtub Gin. But if you have a chance to give us a run down on how it sounded I'll read it. We all have our own journey, dude.


Phish.net

Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.

This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.

Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA

© 1990-2020  The Mockingbird Foundation, Inc. | Hosted by End Point Corporation