Permalink for Comment #1375480148 by FACTSAREUSELESS

, comment by FACTSAREUSELESS
FACTSAREUSELESS @sparkledaisy said:
This is negative. Reviews should be done by people who were actually at the show. Lucky for you... The brightness on the TV can be turned down if it's too cheesy when the light is growing brighter.
Can't agree with this statement and its been made too often this year by others as well.
The fact is, a person at home watching the webcast is the PERFECT choice to do the review. They are more focused on the actual music than someone being jostled and distracted by the crowd around them and affected by the other factors at the venue.

A music review is truly best done by someone NOT in attendance.
Score: 0    
Phish.net Login
Secure Login
Register | Forgot Password
Support Phish.net & Mbird
Make a Donation
Phish.net is a project of the non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.
Recent Blog Posts
Sphere4 Recap: A Spherical Experience 2024-04-22
Sphere3 Recap: Squaring the Sphere 2024-04-21
Sphere2 Recap: ISO 2 Saturdays 2024-04-20
Sphere1 Recap 2024-04-19
Phish Studies Conference Unveils 2024 Agenda, Sphere PhanArt Event 2024-04-17
Attendance Bias Podcast Revisits Phil Lesh And Phriends At The Warfield, April 15-16-17, 1999 2024-04-15
Surrender To The Flow #82: Las Vegas 2024 2024-04-12
PhishNet Was Born June 22, 1991 2024-03-18
Divided Sky Foundation Announces 2024 Fun(d) Run and Music Fest 2024-03-12
This Time Will Be Different: Attendance Bias Podcast Celebrates 15 Years Since Hampton 2009 2024-03-01


Phish.net

Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.

This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.

Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA

© 1990-2024  The Mockingbird Foundation, Inc. | Hosted by Linode