Permalink for Comment #1313937651 by PhanArt
, comment by PhanArt
The way i have understood the law via producing the PhanArt book and working with my lawyer is that a logo spoof/parody cannot be negative or cause a proven loss of money. This is a case waldo can and should win. Its not negative.in the least and how can firestone prove they lost money as a result of this being sold to a non-firestone demographic?
The way i have understood the law via producing the PhanArt book and working with my lawyer is that a logo spoof/parody cannot be negative or cause a proven loss of money. This is a case waldo can and should win. Its not negative.in the least and how can firestone prove they lost money as a result of this being sold to a non-firestone demographic?
Phish.net
The Mockingbird Foundation