Permalink for Comment #1313873358 by MyFellowPrisoners

, comment by MyFellowPrisoners
MyFellowPrisoners Actually, Pint, parodies of registered trademarks/names, service marks/names, etc. are generally deemed by courts to be NON-infringing of mark/name being parodied. f course, large corps often sue for leverage anyway, and usually the parody maker goes away. But when they can and do fight back, often times the parody will prevail as non-infringing.

So, I respectfully disagree with your assertion here.
Score: 5    
Phish.net Login
Secure Login
Register | Forgot Password
Support Phish.net & Mbird
Make a Donation
Phish.net is a project of the non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.
Recent Blog Posts
Phish Studies Conference Unveils 2024 Agenda, Sphere PhanArt Event 2024-04-17
Attendance Bias Podcast Revisits Phil Lesh And Phriends At The Warfield, April 15-16-17, 1999 2024-04-15
Surrender To The Flow #82: Las Vegas 2024 2024-04-12
PhishNet Was Born June 22, 1991 2024-03-18
Divided Sky Foundation Announces 2024 Fun(d) Run and Music Fest 2024-03-12
This Time Will Be Different: Attendance Bias Podcast Celebrates 15 Years Since Hampton 2009 2024-03-01
REPRISE Phish Tribute Debut Streaming Free from Nectar's 2024-02-29
Mexico4 Recap: Meet The New Phish, Same As The Old Phish 2024-02-25
Mexico3 Recap: Then Came the Sound 2024-02-24
Mexico2 Recap: Never-ending Wave of Hope 2024-02-23


Phish.net

Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.

This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.

Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA

© 1990-2024  The Mockingbird Foundation, Inc. | Hosted by Linode