Monday 12/07/2009 by zzyzx


Believe it or not…my Joy Box just arrived!

David Steinberg,, via email 12/7/09
Monday 12/07/2009 by phishnet


Once there was a guy called ‘The Timer.’ He stood in the front row at every show. He had a clipboard and a stopwatch. He was a brilliant math researcher, getting his Ph.D. at someplace like MIT. Whenever we started to play, he would start his stopwatch. His idea of quality was length. Whenever the jam wasn’t long enough, he would shake his head disapprovingly. So we had to ask him to not stand in the front row anymore. I have since heard that he is still timing everything, but just from the back of the hall

Trey Anastasio, to SonicNet, c.1994
Saturday 12/05/2009 by sethadam1


By way of compiling content remnants from the previous version of this site and related projects, we've backdated a number of stories here as blog posts.

But the blog launched with this photo, posted 12/5/09 at noon by Adam.

Saturday 12/05/2009 by sethadam1


You gotta run like a naked guy, out of control!

Trey Anastasio, December 5, 2009
Friday 12/04/2009 by Lemuria


One of the most impressive elements of a Phish concert, aside from the crackerjack light show, is the degree to which fans personally invest themselves in the music. When a song is performed sloppily or a solo doesn’t last as long as it could have, there is an odd sort of familial disappointment, like a son’s embarrassment at his father’s shortcomings. But when the music is strong, it’s like a feedback loop that drives the band higher and higher. You can see it on stage and you can see it in the crowd.

aul Caine, “Phish at Madison Square Garden” (A.V. Club NY review, 12/4/09),
Wednesday 12/02/2009 by Lemuria


Simplicity is the new mantra for Phish.

Portland, ME, newspaper, 12/2/99
Wednesday 01/28/2009 by sethadam1


"Split Open and Melt", 4/16/92

Thursday 01/01/2009 by Lemuria


I'm the overbearing leader type, although I sometimes shy away from that. If Page is the father, I guess I'm the mother.

Trey Anastasio, New York Post, 1/1/99
Thursday 10/09/2008 by Lemuria


The following was posted to the Mockingbird Foundation website on October 9, 2008:

Stat Analysis Suggests Bust-Outs at Spaceship Hampton
Hardcore Methodology has Hardcore Phans Excited

Phish’s return to the stage next March is destined to involve screams of joy, lots of press, and several new songs. The band will perform three shows atHampton Coliseum in Virginia, after more than 4.5 years since its then-permanent breakup. A statistical analysis of information about it’s previous 12 shows at that venue, 34 shows in that state, and 1440 shows in history demonstrates that Hampton performances stand out. Specifically, it suggests that the band will perform Sample in a Jar, Harry Hood, Mike’s Song, Weekapaug Groove, Bathtub Gin, and Cars Trucks Buses (in order of the strength of expectation), as well as at least three new songs.

  • Big Steps - At shows stretching from 5/23/90 at The Library in Richmond, to 8/9/04 at Hampton, Virginia has watched Phish take big steps. Their first contract with hotel provisions was reportedly for 2/21/91 at Trax (signed with Coran Capshaw, now MusicToday founder etc.) [some other big firsts there] Sole summer shows between Santana and HORDE. They’ve performed in Virginia every day of the week, every month but September, and at least once every year from 1990 to 1999, often as they “followed the line going south” (per lyrics from their original tune “Curtain”, the last song of Coventry).
  • Song Diversity - Phish’s 34 Virginia shows have had an average of just over 20 songs per show. With two sets and an encore per show totaling around 150 minutes, that comes to about 7.5 minutes per song on average - and many Hampton shows are, of course, longer. The band has played nearly a third (214, or 31%) of its 690 or so songs in the state, leaving some 476 that haven’t yet vibrated Virginian air. Of songs the band has played, but not in Virginia,


Saturday 09/20/2008 by Lemuria


Starting around 1996, Phish's print advertisements for their shows began to get strange. But 1998 was a banner year for it.

Spring 1998 ads featured a Kung Fu character and proclaimed "Phish Destroys America".

Summer 1998 ads announced that "in addition to their other amazing expoits, the band will perform in a temple of fire", possibly referring to the "ambient fourth set" of the Lemonwheel. (Concerts LA by Casenet actually listed Temple of Fire as the opening act for Ventura!)

Fall 1998 ads (e.g. for the Greek Theatre) read "ROAD SHOW '98 ... They drive FASTER & play HARDER ! ACTION... PHISH.... Their GUTS are as hard as the STEEL in their ENGINES." The ads showed a demolition-derby-type car with a number 72 on the side.


Wednesday 06/16/2004 by Lemuria


Written by Dan Hantman 6/16/04; posted with his permission 11/5/12...

So, I've obviously been thinking a lot about The End of Phish. I realized today that the last show will be almost exactly 10 years after I first heard Phish -- a moment that itself will end up marking roughly the midpoint of the Phish timeline. In that vein, I've been thinking about the portion of Phish's career I've watched unfold in real-time...and all the "big thoughts about music and bands" that Phish has put into my head. I always tell people that Phish taught me how to listen to music. And they certainly taught me what music could mean.

I knew from the moment I heard it that the Announcement was okay, even good. It just felt right in my gut. As I said on this list before, I don't mean to say at *all* that I knew this decision was *coming*, but I definitely was wondering where the band was *going*... and in that context, it all made sense.

So intuitively, on the "heart" level, I was with Trey as soon as I got the news. But I've been trying to put it together on a "head" level. And I think I just got it:

If "Phish" (the idea, the phenomenon) was about one thing... it wasn't about intricate fugues or key changes. It wasn't about sick jamming. It wasn't about drugs or dreadlocks. It wasn't about wacky covers or about cultivating a new Grateful Dead for the suburban-scape. It certainly wasn't about "songwriting." All those things helped shape the band's personality, but they weren't at the core of it.

Rather, Phish was about hard work.

Phish proved, more than any other band, that rock and roll greatness can be archived through sheer, unflinching effort. Phish won because they practiced. Because Trey spend weeks on end writing up the score for crazy wacked-out sonic gymnastics. Because they brought *teachers* out on tour with them to school them in new genres. Because they were constantly forcing themselves to invent: 'Hey' exercises, Oh Kee Pa ceremonies, Big Ball Jams, secret language, hot dogs, musical costumes, macaroni maracas, playing through the night... They never stopped.

Aside perhaps from Fish (who I suspect was born pounding out a rhythm on his round little tummy), I don't think any of the boys is a raw, natural musical genius. There was no Dylan, Hendrix, or Garcia here. They just wanted this so bad, they saw the possibilities, and they went out and fucking did it. That's why when you see Phish at their best on stage, you can see each band member looking around going "holy shit, this is actually fucking happening to me"... no sense of entitlement or expectation, just the joy of somebody who hauls ass and watches it pay off.

And that's why, with the hiatus, and the waning of the desire to bust ass, Phish just had to end.

All bands "stray" from their original genius (use the word "decline" if you want). The Stones are still rocking, but it's just not possible for them to convey the blues-soaked sex romps that defined their glory days. In that way, to the extent that all rock and roll bands are about youth, decline is inevitable. But that's not the point with Phish. Phish *could* have gone on forever, if the impulse to work were still there. If Trey were still calling the other 3 to hop out of bed on a Friday morning and hustle down at 10:15am to work through a set of needlessly difficult exercises -- Phish could go on like that forever. But once they stepped back, took the hiatus, dramatically scaled back the number of shows... it was a foregone conclusion. Phish can't exist at 20, 50 or 75%.

Phish was a 110% operation. The minute it went to 99%, it might as well have been 0%. And I can only say one thing to Trey for having the foresight to see that: Thanks, man.

two cents


Tuesday 06/01/2004 by phishnet


This interview was conducted by Phil Nazarro via email in August 2003, and originally published in the second edition of
The Phish Companion.

Jen met Trey when she was 17, and still in high school. Dave Grippo introduced them when Trey was looking for a trumpet player for One Man’s Trash and Story of the Ghost. They kept in touch over the years, and when he put the six-piece band together he called and asked her to do a tour. She has been in the band ever since.

Phil Nazarro: I’ve read that you come from a Classical background and only discovered Pop music in the last few years. Did you feel comfortable right away doing the R&B-type stuff on your solo recording? Was it a learning process?

Jen Hartswick: There are some things that I’ve come across in my life that just seem right. This music seems right to me at this point in my life. I think it’s just a matter of diving in headfirst and trying new things, which is what we did with Fuse. I think diversity is the key to making and keeping things fun. A year from now I might be immersed in tap dancing and country songs, who knows?

PN: You have played an amazing amount of instruments. Can we get a complete list?

JH: My first instrument was piano, then I moved to clarinet, flute and sax. Tuba came next, and then finally trumpet when I was 10. I still play a little flute and piano.

PN: Where do you stand now as far as broadening your musical (listening) education?

JH: I try to listen to things I feel will benefit my weaknesses. I figure that I have a lot of ground to cover with both past and present. Right now I’m addicted to Jeff Buckley. Last month it was Kathleen Battle, and before that Rachelle Ferrell. Three extremely different musicians, but it’s all a wonderful education. Kathleen Battle is the most outstanding opera singer that has ever walked the earth, as far as I’m concerned. If her album “Grace” doesn’t bring you to tears you have no soul. Rachelle Ferrell is by far the most versatile singer I’ve ever heard. Her album “First Instrument” is a more straight ahead jazz record, and the more recent album “Individuality” is slick, heavy R&B. It’s an amazing record.

PN: As far as Jambands go, what have you heard that you like?

JH: Honestly, I have no idea what a jam band is. You always get into tricky territory when you are trying to categorize music, and a lot of things get lumped together under the term “jamband.” That being said, I listen to a lot of Soulive, Bootyjuice and Addison Groove Project. Do they fall into that category?

PN: I asked that question with a grain of salt. We often banter about the merits of the term “Jamband” when we write about Phish. But in the interest of the book… can we please hear some opinions on Phish’s music through the years?

JH: You’re not going to like this answer. I just don’t listen to Phish. I know I should… it’s on my list of things to do I’ll get to it some day.

PN: Do you prefer playing large or small venues?

JH: I love playing small venues. So much of what it’s about as a band is watching people and connecting with them. There’s no vibe when the audience is half a mile away. I’d take the Stanley over a “Verizon Wireless” center any day.

PN: What single element makes a show for you the most? Is it the venue, audience, musicians, or something else?

JH: I think it’s different for everyone, but for me it’s the musicians. I get such a kick out of listening to everybody evolve and watching the chemistry on any given night. That’s not to say that the audience isn’t an enormous part of what makes a show for me, because it is. Getting to see complete strangers smiling and laughing and dancing because of something I’m a part of is such a beautiful thing.

PN: Was there an intimidation factor going from theaters in winter 2001 to large, outdoor venues that summer? As far as acoustics, audience, improv, etc. what kind of advice did you get from Trey and other bands members about playing live in a larger place?

JH: It’s all intimidating to me on some level, whether I’m playing for 20 people or 20,000 people. I don’t think there’s anything quite as wonderfully intimidating as Red Rocks; not only because of the history of the venue, but just the sheer vulnerability you feel, knowing that you’re completely insignificant standing on that stage. It’s a very humbling experience.

PN: How does one deal with this feeling?

JH: I’m still trying to figure that out.

PN: When improvising, what makes one version of a song longer than another? Do you actually say as a band “We’re going to work this one out tonight because we’re excited about this and need to know where it can go?” Or is it all in the mood, performance, and/or exchange of ideas?

JH: Nothing is ever planned. We don’t usually talk about the music unless it’s in the past tense. “Man, that “First Tube” was nasty when Tony dropped out and Cyro and Ray took over.” If the band is feeling it, we’ll play one tune all night. That’s a threat. You know we’ll do it.

PN: What is your input as to the actual composition of the material in both Trey’s band and in the Phish sessions you’ve done?

JH: Most of my input in Trey’s band comes in the form of vocal harmonization and random horn quips. I think we all have basically the same role once Trey writes a tune. We get together and learn the basic structure, then we all add the things we’re good at. If Russell feels a horn line between verse A and verse B he’ll show it to us and we’ll harmonize it. It has become a formula, because it works well. The recordings I’ve done for Phish in the past have been orchestrated pretty thoroughly, so there wasn’t a lot of room for composition.

PN: Can you offer any details about how the horns coordinate in Trey’s band? Does one of the horns lead?

JH: I think we all take turns leading. Whether we’re off stage or on stage, we’re listening to what’s going on and writing an impromptu line to enhance what’s happening.

PN: If you could play with any one person (living or dead) who would it be?

JH: Louis Armstrong. No contest. The man is responsible not only for making some of the most amazing music in his time, but some of the most beautiful music I’ve ever heard to this day. He paved the way for every jazz musician after him and every trumpet player after him.

PN: Can you offer some thoughts on your own project… where do you hope to take that?

JH: We’re having such an amazing time with the Jennifer Hartswick Band. It’s a combination of some of my favorite musicians who also happened to be some of my oldest and dearest friends. Ray Paczkowski, Dezron Douglas, Dave Diamond, Russ Lawton, Andy Moroz, Dave Grippo, Christina Durfee, Alex Wolston, Luke Laplant and Conor Elmes. Half the band is from my hometown. We’ve been playing music together since we were eight years old. This band is oozing with great chemistry, not to mention funk and soul.

PN: Can you share with us one funny or interesting road story. I’m sure there’s plenty.

JH: We were on our way to Pittsburgh, and while you may never believe it, there’s a wee bit of tomfoolery when the ten of us get together. Now, I’ve been told that my Tweet impression is second to none, so Trey was begging me to sing “Oops, There Goes My Shirt Up Over My Head.” I began singing it, Trey started dancing like the white boy he is, everyone was singing along and gettin’ down; it was a scene. Loud, obnoxious mayhem. With one flashy move Trey managed to knock a full wine bottle from a counter five feet high onto my big toe, shattering the bone. So now every time I catch a glimpse of my foot there’s a scar where the bone poked through the skin. Thanks, Trey.

PN: Free Space: Is there anything at all that you would like to say to your fans that you have never been given the chance to say?

JH: I just want to say thank you to all the people who have been so fantastic over the past few years. The positive energy is ever flowing, and doesn’t go unnoticed. Thanks also to everyone who comes to hear my band – I hope you guys are having as much fun as we are.


Monday 07/28/2003 by Lemuria


The idea behind Live Phish downloads is to get as much music to as many fans as possible as quickly as possible. With that thought in mind, I am confident that Phish will continue to embrace technology as a means to achieve this goal. The sky is the limit in terms of potential applications and I am definitely excited to see how things evolve.

Brad Serling of (7/28/03)
Thursday 04/17/2003 by phishnet

TREY VS. ....

I could take Dave Matthews in a fight. No, I’ll be braver. I could take on Henry Rollins…well, maybe not Rollins. But I will take Perry Farrell.

Trey Anastasio, quoted in Rolling Stone 4/17/03
Thursday 03/06/2003 by Lemuria


"That's how our whole career has been - stupid ideas that work."
- Page in Rolling Stone, 3/6/03, p. 42

Page 102 of 110 is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.

This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.

Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal

© 1990-2019  The Mockingbird Foundation, Inc. | Hosted by End Point Corporation