Permalink for Comment #1377320083 by uctweezer

, comment by uctweezer
uctweezer @mcgrupp81 said:
Interesting choices this week. I heard the first jam and knew it was a soundcheck and the sound quality reeked of LivePhish. The contrast of the awful second recording was nice. It actually made me think of an old copy of the Clifford Ball soundcheck I had in terms of sound quality though I knew it wasn't the jam. I honestly suspected it could have been a really bad copy of a Fall 98 jam. 6 months to MJM #300. Will he make it?
If you're asking if I'll make it to MJM300, probably! If I don't it won't be for a lack of ideas or jams... I already have the next 14 MJMs clipped and ready to go.
Score: 6    
Phish.net Login
Secure Login
Register | Forgot Password
Support Phish.net & Mbird
Make a Donation
Phish.net is a project of the non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.
Recent Blog Posts
Sphere4 Recap: A Spherical Experience 2024-04-22
Sphere3 Recap: Squaring the Sphere 2024-04-21
Sphere2 Recap: ISO 2 Saturdays 2024-04-20
Sphere1 Recap 2024-04-19
Phish Studies Conference Unveils 2024 Agenda, Sphere PhanArt Event 2024-04-17
Attendance Bias Podcast Revisits Phil Lesh And Phriends At The Warfield, April 15-16-17, 1999 2024-04-15
Surrender To The Flow #82: Las Vegas 2024 2024-04-12
PhishNet Was Born June 22, 1991 2024-03-18
Divided Sky Foundation Announces 2024 Fun(d) Run and Music Fest 2024-03-12
This Time Will Be Different: Attendance Bias Podcast Celebrates 15 Years Since Hampton 2009 2024-03-01


Phish.net

Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.

This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.

Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA

© 1990-2024  The Mockingbird Foundation, Inc. | Hosted by Linode