Permalink for Comment #1376613574 by uctweezer

, comment by uctweezer
uctweezer @CadillacRainb0ws said: "@uctweezer said: "@CadillacRainb0ws said: "@uctweezer said: "@FIKUS0824 said: ""

Or don't, because that would be cheating and would especially suck for those folks who are working on figuring it out fair and square.

And for what it's worth, if he really does have #3 I'd be shocked if he didn't have leads on the other two by now...
"

I wasnt able to jump from 3 to 1 and 2 as easily as you figured...
"

Did you notice that #3 was played in Canada? Anyway, these aren't supposed to be impossible, but we'll see how it goes before abandoning the new format. With phish.in / PhishTracks and the jam charts, we've seen so many difficult MJMs drop in the first hour that I figured we should try something different for a bit. It's not necessarily a unilateral change though.
"

Im in favor of keeping this format... It was a lot of fun this week. A+
"

Sweet, thanks, I'm glad to hear it! Sort of levels the playing field a bit, because no one is just going to waltz in and take it without a second thought. If you work for it, you can get it, but it's not just about the amount of time you're willing to spend -- there's still the typical MJM intuition involved, like pinpointing the era / key / venue type etc., and the puzzle aspect makes it a little more interesting too I think. Next week will be interesting for sure...


Phish.net

Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.

This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.

Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA

© 1990-2024  The Mockingbird Foundation, Inc. | Hosted by Linode