Permalink for Comment #1376573126 by uctweezer
, comment by uctweezer
@harry_hoodlum said:
No first sets in those posted thus far, but Phish has been relatively predictable in their setlist improvisational balance throughout 3.0, in terms of leaving most (if not all) of the heavy improvisation for the second set. There are a few exceptions to this of course (off the top of my head, 7/3/11 I, 8/31/12 I) that score highly in many fans' estimation for bringing things like segues, bust-outs, and the occasional bona fide deep exploration, BUT -- if it's all about the jams for you, as it is for many of us -- you're going to see heavy second set-bias picking favorites from 3.0 (and to be honest, much of the band's history outside of the late '90s and 2.0).
@harry_hoodlum said:
No first sets in those posted thus far, but Phish has been relatively predictable in their setlist improvisational balance throughout 3.0, in terms of leaving most (if not all) of the heavy improvisation for the second set. There are a few exceptions to this of course (off the top of my head, 7/3/11 I, 8/31/12 I) that score highly in many fans' estimation for bringing things like segues, bust-outs, and the occasional bona fide deep exploration, BUT -- if it's all about the jams for you, as it is for many of us -- you're going to see heavy second set-bias picking favorites from 3.0 (and to be honest, much of the band's history outside of the late '90s and 2.0).
Phish.net
The Mockingbird Foundation