Permalink for Comment #1375703455 by bertoletdown

, comment by bertoletdown
bertoletdown @dumidiot said:
I'm gonna come out and say it: this show topped 1/3. The jamming was way more pleasing to my ear, and when you stack that tweezer on too of the second set, I'm just boggled that this show is getting trashed. Even the first set had some REALLY strong playing that tops out 1/3 set 1. Id go so far as to call it criminally underrated.
What did you think was special about the first set?

It was distinctly first setty to these ears. YMMV of course.
Score: 0    
Phish.net Login
Secure Login
Register | Forgot Password
Support Phish.net & Mbird
Make a Donation
Phish.net is a project of the non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.
Recent Blog Posts
Sphere4 Recap: A Spherical Experience 2024-04-22
Sphere3 Recap: Squaring the Sphere 2024-04-21
Sphere2 Recap: ISO 2 Saturdays 2024-04-20
Sphere1 Recap 2024-04-19
Phish Studies Conference Unveils 2024 Agenda, Sphere PhanArt Event 2024-04-17
Attendance Bias Podcast Revisits Phil Lesh And Phriends At The Warfield, April 15-16-17, 1999 2024-04-15
Surrender To The Flow #82: Las Vegas 2024 2024-04-12
PhishNet Was Born June 22, 1991 2024-03-18
Divided Sky Foundation Announces 2024 Fun(d) Run and Music Fest 2024-03-12
This Time Will Be Different: Attendance Bias Podcast Celebrates 15 Years Since Hampton 2009 2024-03-01


Phish.net

Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.

This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.

Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA

© 1990-2024  The Mockingbird Foundation, Inc. | Hosted by Linode